ink drop - stock.adobe.com

The Supreme Court has handed down its decision in Uber v Aslam – a long running case concerning employment status. Unsurprisingly, the Court has concluded (in the same vein as lower court decisions) that Uber drivers are workers and not self-employed.  

This means that Uber drivers are entitled to claim:

  • Minimum wage (including backpay for minimum wage);
  • Potentially up to two years’ backpay (or more);
  • 5.6 weeks’ paid annual leave each year; and 
  • They will have whistleblowing and similar rights.

This judgment does not give them ‘employee’ rights, such as the right to a redundancy payment or to claim unfair dismissal.

However, this case is a reminder to employers to carefully consider the relationship it has with its staff and the ramifications for incorrectly identifying those who are genuinely self-employed versus those who are workers/employees. 

See below for our previous blogs concerning this case:

https://esphr.co.uk/news/uber-drivers-are-uber-workers

https://esphr.co.uk/news/uber-drivers-are-workers-confirms-the-eat

https://esphr.co.uk/news/the-uber-decision-what-does-it-mean-and-why-is-it-so-important-

https://esphr.co.uk/news/after-uber-and-deliveroo-what-does-worker-status-actually-mean-

 


We are the HR and employment law experts from ESPHR.

It’s our mission to advise and develop the employment law capability of HR professionals wherever we can, helping HR teams make a real commercial difference to their organisations. That way, you spend less time solving operational issues and more time actioning projects that drive far-reaching change in your company.

Call 0333 006 2929 or email info@esphr.co.uk today to discover exactly how we can help you.

 

Get the latest HR and employment law news, advice, insight, free resources and promotions straight to your inbox